* A post Ghassan felt obliged to make after efforts failed in private to alert a budding new American analyst to the problems of the language and concepts he was using in a region wracked with sectarianism. The screen shots of the discussions are interesting and highly informative reading about the issue as well as showing examples of the problems the movement was encountering with some domineering solidarists who displayed towards the natives from the region a level of arrogance and disrespect for their lived experiences and knowledge.
CAUTION AGAINST USE OF SECTARIAN CONCEPTS AND LANGUAGE.
By Ghassan Kadi 23 September 2014
CAUTION AGAINST USE OF SECTARIAN CONCEPTS AND LANGUAGE.
By Ghassan Kadi 23 September 2014
This
article, which was posted on many groups, I hate to say, is full of
inaccuracies and incongruent analogies, but my comments are not going to
focus on this.
I quite frankly find it rather dangerous to
use/coin the term "Shia Circle". As if it wasn't bad enough for the
Islamists (Sunnis) to use the term "the Shiite Crescent" as a means of
fear-mongering and a recruitment drive. Now, our friend and ally Andrew
Korybko, who should know better, is using a much stronger term that
implies encirlement and siege. If the Islamists find out that Western
analysts are using such a term, they will use it as fodder and run with
it. They will scream out "look at what Iran and the Shia are planning to
do to us", and this will give them more reasons and excuses to cry out
for taking up arms and push harder to incite new recruits to join the
ranks of the IS and other organizations.
As a matter of fact,
they are already making such outcries. They are already proclaiming that
the Persians invented Chess and are the masters of trickery and
military cruelty. They are already claiming that Lebanon is in the hands
of Hezbollah and that Iran totally controls Syria and trying to control
Iraq and that what we are witnessing now in Iraq is a counter Sunni
revolution. Why in God's name does this very well-intentioned author
want to give them more ammunition to their naïve argument?
Obviously, Andrew is unaware of what goes on within Sunni circles and
how preachers brain-wash the minds of Sunni youths. He is unaware that
his words can be used as weapons by the enemies of Syria. This is why,
as Syrians, we have to make a vehement appeal to our Western friends and
allies to make well-informed statements. We must plead to them to learn
about our culture and how Arab/Muslim movers and shakers make their
marks on opinions, how they win and lose hearts and minds, how and why
Muslim youths are lured into the ranks of ISIL, and how certain words,
well-intentioned as they may be, can have serious and very harmful
outcomes.
To put things in perspective, in retrospect, the
haphazard and ill-informed use of words that come from a position of
lack of understanding of the Arabic/Muslim culture is not any different
from say an Arab writer writing about American politics and referring to
African Americans and to homosexuals in derogatory terms. What is it
that makes Western analysts think that the Arab culture does not have
its own sensitive issues that require knowledge of the culture?
It means so much to us to have supporters from all over the world, and
we are greatly thankful to them. Some however are adamant not to listen
to local voices that are trying to help them better understand the
cultures they are dealing with. As a Syrian who is fairly senior in age,
I find it is rather offensive when I see juvenile and irresponsible
words used willy-nilly without any consideration to my culture, all in
the name of support.
If some non-Arab supporters don't know what
they are talking about and are not fully aware of the sensitivity of
what they are saying, and more importantly, if they are too stubborn to
accept that they need to learn, it would be much better off for us, if
they (with respect) stay out of it.
See original link to post and discussion
https://www.facebook.com/groups/283089981710448/permalink/853883161297791/
Analyst Andrew Korybko posted this in the group and the discussion below the post follows after concerns raised about the term and concept of "Shia Circle".
https://www.facebook.com/groups/283089981710448/permalink/853499794669461/
See original link to post and discussion
https://www.facebook.com/groups/283089981710448/permalink/853883161297791/
Analyst Andrew Korybko posted this in the group and the discussion below the post follows after concerns raised about the term and concept of "Shia Circle".
https://www.facebook.com/groups/283089981710448/permalink/853499794669461/
Korybko introduced his article : "[h]ere is my latest article on "Syria’s Yemeni Opportunity and the Rise of the Shia Circle":
https://sputniknews.com/columnists/20140922193177888-Syrias-Yemeni-Opportunity-and-the-Rise-of-the-Shia-Circle/
"The inclusion of the Houthis into the Yemeni government and their speedy and skillful demonstration of force and influence over the past week place Saudi Arabia on the strategic defensive. Not only do they have to contend with the prospect of an Iranian-friendly government on their southern Shiite border, but taken in a regional perspective, it appears as though Iran is cementing its Shia Circle. All of this bodes well for Syria, as the Saudis are now faced with a conundrum over whether to aggressively pursue regime change in Damascus and risk domestic Shia destabilization, or to negotiate with arch-rival Iran and reach an agreement to mitigate overall tensions."
https://sputniknews.com/columnists/20140922193177888-Syrias-Yemeni-Opportunity-and-the-Rise-of-the-Shia-Circle/
"The inclusion of the Houthis into the Yemeni government and their speedy and skillful demonstration of force and influence over the past week place Saudi Arabia on the strategic defensive. Not only do they have to contend with the prospect of an Iranian-friendly government on their southern Shiite border, but taken in a regional perspective, it appears as though Iran is cementing its Shia Circle. All of this bodes well for Syria, as the Saudis are now faced with a conundrum over whether to aggressively pursue regime change in Damascus and risk domestic Shia destabilization, or to negotiate with arch-rival Iran and reach an agreement to mitigate overall tensions."
Discussion Continued...
No comments:
Post a Comment